NOW AVAILABLE Need a prescription for Leva? Click here to get started
Leva® combines prescription, home-based pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with real-time motion-based visual feedback, patient support, and progress monitoring.
Published clinical studies demonstrate meaningful symptom improvement, while peer-reviewed health economic modeling projects lower medical spending when Leva is incorporated into the urinary incontinence care pathway.
FDA-Cleared Prescription Therapy
Clinical Evidence in UI & FI
Published Randomized & Real-World Evidence
Peer-Reviewed Health Economic Evidence
Important Indication and Other Information for the Leva® Pelvic Health System
The Leva® Pelvic Health System is intended for (1) strengthening of pelvic floor muscles, (2) rehabilitation and training of weak pelvic floor muscles for the treatment of stress, mixed, and mild to moderate urgency urinary incontinence (including overactive bladder) in women and (3) rehabilitation and training of weak pelvic floor muscles for the first-line treatment of chronic fecal incontinence (>3-month uncontrolled passage of feces) in women. This device interacts with the user via smartphone technology. Treatment with the Leva System is by prescription and is not for everyone. Please talk to your prescriber to see if Leva System is right for you. Your prescriber should discuss all potential benefits and risks with you. Do not use the Leva System while pregnant, or if you think you may be pregnant, unless authorized by your doctor. For complete risk information and instructions, review the current Leva Pelvic Health System Instructions for Use.
Pharmacy Code
60002099440
HCPCS Code
S9002
Pelvic floor muscle training is an established treatment for urinary and fecal incontinence, yet many women face barriers to accessing structured, supervised care. Leva provides guided PFMT at home, combining real-time, motion-based visual feedback with patient support and clinician reporting.
Published randomized and real-world studies support the safety and effectiveness of Leva for women with urinary and fecal incontinence.
Urinary Incontinence
80%
Reduction in leakage episodes after only 8 weeks
From a published randomized controlled trial.1
Urinary Incontinence
24 months
Sustained symptom improvement
Lasting symptom improvement through two years of follow-up.2
Urinary Incontinence
74%
Achieved clinically meaningful improvement
From a 947-patient real-world study.3
Fecal Incontinence
Randomized and Real-World Evidence
Randomized and real-world studies demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in fecal incontinence symptoms, with improvement in pelvic floor muscle performance and high treatment engagement.4,5
In a large U.S. claims analysis, women with stress or mixed urinary incontinence had significantly greater healthcare utilization and higher medical costs than matched women without UI. Over two years, mean total medical costs were 61% higher among women with SUI/MUI.⁶
A 2025 peer-reviewed budget impact analysis evaluated the projected economic impact of incorporating Leva into the urinary incontinence treatment pathway for a hypothetical one-million-member U.S. commercial health plan. The model compared current clinical practice with a scenario in which 15% of women receiving treatment for UI received Leva.
Projected commercial health plan savings7
Projected health plan savings over 24 months
Projected average savings per member per month
Projected lower estimated 24-month cost per treated patient
The model projected lower utilization of higher-cost advanced treatments when Leva was incorporated into the treatment pathway. Actual costs and savings may vary by health plan.
1. Weinstein MM, Dunivan G, Guaderrama NM, Richter HE. Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(4):606–615. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004725.
2. Weinstein MM, Dunivan GC, Guaderrama NM, Richter HE. A Motion-based Device Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Longitudinal Analysis at 18 and 24 Months. Int Urogynecol J. 2024. doi:10.1007/s00192-023-05721-z.
3. Hall E, Keyser L, McKinney J, Pulliam S, Weinstein M. Real-World Evidence From a Digital Health Treatment Program for Female Urinary Incontinence: Observational Study of Outcomes Following User-Centered Product Design. JMIR Formative Research. 2024;8:e58551. doi:10.2196/58551.
4. Patel UJ, Keyser LE, Gontarczyk Uczkowski N, Giles DL, Brown HW. Home-Based Biofeedback for Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Urogynecology (Phila). 2026;32(4):464-473. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001810.
5. Keyser LE, Mueller JL, Hosterman LM, McKinney JL, Pulliam SJ, Bordeianou L. A Digital Therapeutic Pelvic Health System Improves Fecal Incontinence Symptoms in a Real-World Patient Cohort. Dis Colon Rectum. 2026;69(6):1712–1721. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000004195.
6. Datar M, Pan LC, McKinney JL, Goss TF, Pulliam SJ. Healthcare Resource Use and Cost Burden of Urinary Incontinence to United States Payers. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;1-10. doi:10.1002/nau.24989.
7. Hall E, Sharma A, Goss TF, Hung K. U.S. payer budget impact of the Leva Pelvic Health System to improve pelvic floor muscle training as first-line treatment of female urinary incontinence compared to real-world clinical practice. J Med Econ. 2025;28(1):637–647. doi:10.1080/13696998.2025.2494940.